The image “http://www.votetrustusa.org/images/votetrust-small2.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

 

The nation's clearinghouse for election audit information!
State and Local Election Integrity Organizations
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Maryland
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Montana
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
Ohio
Oregon
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas
Vermont
Virginia
Wisconsin
VoteTrustUSA does not speak on behalf of any of the listed organizations.
: mosShowVIMenu( $params ); break; } ?>

   
Around the States

ACLU-New Jersey Demands End to Voting Machine Gag Order PDF  | Print |  Email
By ACLU-NJ Media Release   
June 10, 2008
The American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, New Jersey Press Association, North Jersey Media Group and New Jersey Foundation for Open Government today submitted a friend-of-the-court brief to the NJ Superior Court, seeking reversal of an order that silences experts from discussing future findings about the state's Sequoia voting machines even if concealing their findings could compromise the integrity of elections.

In May, the court agreed to let investigators examine the machines. But the court prohibited those experts from discussing their findings until the case is finished, including through appeals, even if they believe there are errors or the system can be hacked.

"If the flaws in voting machines are under wraps until this case is over, the November election will have come and gone long before we'll know whether our votes were accurately counted," said Lawrence Lustberg of Gibbons PC, who, along with Avidan Cover of Gibbons PC, wrote the brief on behalf of the ACLU-NJ. "Our state has the responsibility to uphold our constitutional right to vote, and the public has the right to know when that right is threatened."


The ACLU-NJ does not object to the portion of the court order that keeps Sequoia's proprietary information - the unique design of its machines - confidential.

The lawsuit, Gusciora v. Codey, filed by Rutgers Constitutional Litigation Clinic, stemmed from the fact that the current electronic voting systems cannot be adequately certified or examined, as demanded by New Jersey law.

Earlier this month, the ACLU-NJ and League of Women Voters of New Jersey released a report on voting rights documenting the biggest problems during the February presidential primary, and voting machine errors were some of the most prevalent and serious problems.

Comment on This Article
You must login to leave comments...
Other Visitors Comments
You must login to see comments...
< Prev   Next >
State Resources
Election Law @ Moritz
Electionline
National Conference of State Legislatures
Verified Voting
Model Legislation
: mosShowVIMenu( $params ); break; } ?>
State Pages
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Jersey
New Hampshire
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Guam
Puerto Rico
: mosShowVIMenu( $params ); break; } ?>