The image “http://www.votetrustusa.org/images/votetrust-small2.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

 

The nation's clearinghouse for election audit information!
State and Local Election Integrity Organizations
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Maryland
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Montana
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
Ohio
Oregon
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas
Vermont
Virginia
Wisconsin
VoteTrustUSA does not speak on behalf of any of the listed organizations.
: mosShowVIMenu( $params ); break; } ?>

   
Around the States

Ohio Secretary of State Report on March Primary Elections PDF  | Print |  Email
By Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner   
June 18, 2008
Download the Full Report

Executive Summary

The administration of elections in 2008 showed vast improvement from the 2004 presidential primary election. The first directive issued by this administration in February 2007, Directive 2007-01, established minimum qualifications for all directors and deputies (See Appendix III, page 263). In December 2007 the secretary of state’s Ethics Policy (See Appendix III, page 295) was adopted. This policy provides guidance to members and employees of county boards of elections, poll workers, employees, and appointees of the secretary of state to clearly state expectations and legal requirements for complying with the state’s ethics law and working in such a manner so as to ensure public confidence in the state’s elections.

Overall the county boards of elections performed exceedingly well in the March 4, 2008 primary election. A record high 46% of eligible voters turned out for this presidential primary (3,603,523 of the 7,826,480 registered voters in Ohio) to cast their ballots. Over 500,000 voters (approximately 14% of the primary election’s voters) voted by absentee ballot, taking advantage of the recent change in state law that does not require a reason to vote absentee.ii The professionalism and emergency planning by boards of elections allowed them to overcome unforgiving weather conditions, power outrages, bomb threats and late evening court orders.

In addition to the directive for backup paper ballots, other directives provided instruction and guidance on ID requirements for voters, absentee voting, provisional voting, proper procedures for processing absent voter’s ballots prior to Election Day, unofficial and official canvass procedures, recount procedures, and post-election audit procedures. (See Appendix III, Directives and Appendix VII, Court Orders, page 511) In addition, instructions were provided for polling place security and chain of custody procedures for transporting voting equipment, ballots and election supplies, as well as instructions on the proper procedures for encryption of security cards for DREs. Secretary of state advisories provided information and instructions on the presence of observers in polling places, polling place conduct, media access to polling locations and
exit polling. (See Appendix IV, page 441)

The newly created Voting Rights Institute in the secretary of state’s office fielded hundreds of calls throughout Election Day in response to 4 million information cards supplied to boards of elections for distribution at polling places that provided voters with telephone numbers and e-mail addresses for questions and concerns about their election experience. This newly created avenue of communication allowed the secretary of state’s office to assist voters to ensure enfranchisement.

County boards of elections were instructed by directive to call their assigned election attorney in the secretary of state’s office in the case of machine failure or ballot shortage. Sixteen full-time regional liaisons were on call throughout the state and assisted boards of elections, responding to their questions and concerns and conduced spot checks of polling places for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance.

Additional areas of focus before the November presidential election are the development and implementation of “best practices” for security of voting equipment, ballots and related supplies, as well as continued development of board of elections staff and poll worker training materials and curriculum. Collaboration has already begun between the Ohio Association of Election Officials and the secretary of state’s office to discuss and develop improved security practices. The secretary of state’s office will continue to improve and standardize the directives and advisories issued to boards of elections to further clarify expectations and application of the law for what is expected to be a record turnout for the November general election to be held November 4, 2008. 
Comment on This Article
You must login to leave comments...
Other Visitors Comments
You must login to see comments...
< Prev   Next >
State Resources
Election Law @ Moritz
Electionline
National Conference of State Legislatures
Verified Voting
Model Legislation
: mosShowVIMenu( $params ); break; } ?>
State Pages
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Jersey
New Hampshire
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Guam
Puerto Rico
: mosShowVIMenu( $params ); break; } ?>