The image “http://www.votetrustusa.org/images/votetrust-small2.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

 

The nation's clearinghouse for election audit information!
State and Local Election Integrity Organizations
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Maryland
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Montana
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
Ohio
Oregon
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas
Vermont
Virginia
Wisconsin
VoteTrustUSA does not speak on behalf of any of the listed organizations.
: mosShowVIMenu( $params ); break; } ?>

   
Around the States

New Directive to Increase Protection for Ohio Voters From Partisan Voter Caging PDF Print Email
By ProjectVote   
September 08, 2008
In response to strong concerns expressed by Project Vote about the potential for partisan abuse of Ohio’s vague voter challenger laws, Ohio’s Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner took an important step to clarify the law and protect Ohio voters from partisan voter caging. In a directive issued on Friday to all Ohio Elections Boards, the secretary makes it clear that Ohio voters must be afforded notice and due process before their right to vote is challenged, and that returned mail alone can not be used as a partisan tool to suppress the vote in this presidential election year.

The directive helps restore basic rights that the Ohio legislature took away in a controversial series of voter challenge laws, passed in 2006, which required county boards of election to send non-forwardable mailings to each registered voter 60 days before the election. Names on the lists of returned or undeliverable notice letters could be accessed by partisan operatives through public records laws to create ready-made “voter caging” lists. Project Vote had expressed concerns that up to 600,000 eligible voters—including a disproportionate number of minorities and youths—could be unlawfully stricken from the voter rolls based solely on problems with the mail.

Recent history shows that such concerns are justified. In 2004, partisans filed 35,000 challenges to Ohio voters in a mass voter caging that disproportionally impacted people of color. The challenges were based solely on a single piece of returned, non-forwardable mail. The resulting chaos disenfranchised voters, overwhelmed boards of election, and led to multiple lawsuits.

“Partisan, challengers who have obtained a list of returned letters shouldn't be allowed to intimidate low-income and minority Ohioans, or strip eligible voters of their rights,” says Teresa James, attorney with Project Vote. “Particularly in light of the troubling history of voter caging in Ohio, Secretary Brunner is to be commended for her strong leadership on this issue and her firm commitment to protecting the rights of Ohio voters. 
Comment on This Article
You must login to leave comments...


Other Visitors Comments
There are no comments currently....
< Prev   Next >
State Resources
Election Law @ Moritz
Electionline
National Conference of State Legislatures
Verified Voting
Model Legislation
: mosShowVIMenu( $params ); break; } ?>
State Pages
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Jersey
New Hampshire
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Guam
Puerto Rico
: mosShowVIMenu( $params ); break; } ?>